Is Google patronizing?
A difficult question. Of course we have the proverb "Power corrupts" and nobody can deny that Google is among
the most powerful ICT companies worldwide. So they must be strong not to corrupt themselves.
Google's mission statement is as follows (see
http://www.google.com/corporate/):
Google's mission is to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.
A noble task; but how noble is the execution of this task?Google: some history
If you want to read the success stories of Page and Brin, visit the Google site and there will be enough pages
dedicated to this subject. The chance of you being able to repeat this is fairly minimal. Page and Brin were
not particularly poor chaps with a good idea. They were typical examples of upper class youth in and from
upper class environments who had it all lined up in the right time.
I'm not jealous. I'm just pointing out that they were in the right spot in the right time, surrounded by the
right people (with plenty of money around) and that's what made their success.
Until 1998, the primary search engine was Altavista. You needed to wade through pages and pages of
commercials. The search phrases were difficult. Responses were uncertain and the amount of content on the web
was minimal, and (at the same time) growing like crazy.
Then Google appeared. They had the sleek search page they still offer. Plus the "I'm feeling lucky" buttton
which was a commercial of its own. People just HAD to see this goofy websearch page with the funny button.
The search results pages were sober. No commercials. No adwords. No extra contents that did not have any
seeming relation with the searchphrase (like naked girls as a result of the search phrase "TTL 74HC14"). That
made a big difference with Altavista. So the Google search engine was available when it counted: at the start
of the internet boom.
Later it became clear that the goals of Google were far simpler than "to organize the world's information and
make it universally accessible". Google was simply about making money. As we have come to expect from US
companies (in particular). The search results are not for sale, as far as we know, but the concept of the
adwords and such was a golden move. For investors. Not for the users of Google. Suddenly there were sponsored
links, specially coloured bars in the top, that had no real significance to my search phrase.
At the moment, companies can buy words which will bring the companies' webpages upfront above the search
results. Google is back, where Altavista left off: commercials clobbering the search results.
The difference: at present there is but one big search engine: Google. All the others are forgotten or pushed
to the background. Browser makers install a Google bar. And the "Search" button is not user definable. It's
Google or it's a hand-typed URL. This may be good for Google Incorporated, but it's not good for We, The
People!
And then there is, of course the case where Google gave in to the demands of the chinese government:
China wins
.
You can ask what you want, but if the chinese don't like it, you won't see what you need. Perhaps the chinese
citizens need to buy all the adwords available and then force the government into something very weird...
My case: the anti-call-center-case
In my country (The Netherlands) people are terrorizd by call centers who call in around dinner time and try to
sell all kind of silly (and partly fraud) products. It's the spam of the telephone system. There's no law
against it. That's because the liberal party (VVD and the lot, owned by the spokesmen of commerce) is against
everything which is related to controlling the 'making of money'.
In the past I have been terrorized by some of these call center related businesses. So I decided to publish a
webpage about this and the ways I walked in order to fight back. For those of us that have some command of my
language, here is the webpage:
http://www.verhoeven272.nl/etc/telefoon.html.
This page, which is about fighting back to call centers, was the most requested page from my website. More
than a 1000 hits per month. When I looked the subject up in Google, my page was on the first page of search
results. Which was the same for the other search engines (Yahoo, Altavista). Apparently, people want to stand
a chance against the telephone invaders. And this page supplied them with some ideas.
In my statistics, the telephone webpage almost disappeared overnight at the end of February or early March
2007. I did not pay much attention to it. These things happen and mostly the attention returns in a few weeks.
Not in this case. The attention was gone and it was not coming back.
This made me curious and I decided to do some Google searching. I picked a search phrase and went to the three
most important search engines. The telephone page appeared in the search results as it did before, for Yahoo
and Altavista. But the webpage was completely gone in Google searches.
This is strange. I did not ask Google to remove the page from their databases, and even if you do so, in most
cases, Google ignores the request. Remember: they have a Holy Quest: "to organize the world's information and
make it universally accessible and useful".
The graph in this chapter shows what happened since early March (when the blacklisting began). Webtraffic is
decreased by 25% each month. Don't fuck with Google, is what the graph says. No matter what their mission
statement is, Google tells you what's right and rong.
Test: 1, 2, 3
We're going to do some tests in order to prove the hypothesis. On the webpage in question,
http://www.verhoeven272.nl/etc/telefoon.html,
I select some texts which are not likely to be found elsewhere on the internet. These pieces of text are as
shown below:
| Phrase | Yahoo | Altavista | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Telefonische inbraak |
04-2007 : Page 25
07-2007 : Page 1, nr 1 |
Page 3 | Page 1, nr 1 |
| KPN en de hermandad |
04-2007 ; Not found 07-2007 : Page 1. nr 1 |
Page 1, center | Page 1, nr 3 |
| telefoon terreur telepathic |
04-2007 : Not found 07-2007 : Page 1, nr 2 |
Page 1, nr 1 | Page 1, nr 2 |
| naar meneer Uilemans | Not found Page 1, nr 1 |
Page 1, number 1 | Page 1, number 1 |
What could have happened
I just switched my mind in Paranoia mode. Below I give my opinions about what could have happened:
Contacting Google
This is as easy as trying to contact the local wino via E-mail... I tried several addresses and all bounced.
Only the very last one from the list worked, so far. I think this is ridiculous. If you are so powerful and
have so much influence in the webworld, you need to have at least some Email adresses that are available to
the public.
I tried the following E-mail addresses:
Recommendations
What happened to me can happen to you any moment as well. Therefore I can only stress people to go against data mining monopolist Google: re-instate the old search engines. They have improved and they do not censor the web. Not for money and not for Higher Ethics. Or out of stupidity.
Further reading and proof of concept
On the internet I found some webpages that covert this subject. GFoogle seems to have a list of words or phrases to block unwanted content.
We're back online!
Replacing the T-word with the Z-word was enough to bring the modified page online. It's now 5 May 2007 and
less than a week ago I modified the page that caused all this. I replaced the T-word by the word 't e r r o r
i s t'. Same word, only spaces added to fool Google.
Today, the page in question was in the search results listing again! On page 1, as it used to be.
So the conclusion is easy: Google has a hidden censoring dictionary. It protects us against ourselves. Cute,
isn't it?
After four months...
It's early July now and Google seems to have released the grip on my pages. The banned pages are being found
again, yet the traffic is still a lot less than it used to be. See if that picks up again after the holidays.
It's end of july now and the traffic data for July (75% done) have picked up to the old levels again!
Apparently my ban has been lifted by Google. I didn't know I was ON a blacklist and all of a sudden I am OFF
it again. It's all automatic. No people at Google have been involved, as far as I know. Unless they are mutes.
Now you're online with a well visited website and after having used ONE single blacklisted word, you're out of
business. Without a single warning or reminder. Google's computers are allmighty. They decide over your fate.
So better stay inline with the Master Race or you will be sorry.
Let's be honest: this is scary. It reminds me of a quote by a US official: "Power corrupts, but absolute power
is kind of neat". Google is very close to this kind of neatness. Google have us by the balls. Time to spend
more time on Yahoo and Altavista. The absolute power has made Google go berzerk. Google acts as if they are
the God of Internet. I wonder how long it will take them to send their version of Jezus down to earth.
On the left, you see the daily statistics for July 2007. On or around 7-7-7 (the Google guys are VERY
religious) there seems to have been a general pardon for all of those who got out of favour with Google. Or
Page and Brin got a message from the Lord of the Skies that they need to re-instate my website.
Whatever happened, we will probably never find out. Google (the word starts with the same letter as the name
of the Supreme Being; I don't think this is a coincidence) just lifted all sanctions on my site and possibly
some other 'rogue' sites that misbehaved, despite the freedom of speech act to which Google are bound.
The weekend dips in my daily use graphs are normal. But the 777 event does surely trigger my mind. What has
happened then and there? Who else has been affected? How special is this?
A message for terrorists
Dear t e r r o r i s t ,
If you want to hide your pages from being indexed by Google, just put 40 times the T-word in the top or bottom
of your pages and your webpages will be ignored by Google.
Page created on 8 april 2007 and
Page equipped with FroogleBuster technology